BAG 6 AZR 126/10•Partial dismissal of appeal as inadmissible in wage classification case
BAG 6 AZR 126/10Bag / Division 6Oct 19, 2010Modified
Extracted by Omnilex
The Federal Labour Court dealt with a revision in a wage classification dispute against a state employer. In the context of a parallel lead case, the parties waived findings of fact and reasons. The court partially set aside the judgment of the Hessian Regional Labour Court. It held that the plaintiff's appeal was inadmissible insofar as it sought a declaration that the defendant owed base pay under pay group III of the BAT at the highest age step for the period from 1 August 2008 to 31 December 2009. The plaintiff had to bear the costs of the appeal and revision.
§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of findings and reasons in a parallel lead case: where the parties dispense with findings of fact and reasons, the appellate court may decide accordingly without a full statement of reasons. If a revision only affects a defined part of the operative part, the court may limit its setting aside and declare the corresponding appeal inadmissible. Costs follow the outcome of the revision and appeal.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-10-19
Aktenzeichen: 6 AZR 126/10
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Gießen, 16. April 2009, Az: 1 Ca 69/09, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 6. Januar 2010, Az: 2 Sa 1293/09, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 6. Senat
Auf die Revision des beklagten Landes wird das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 6. Januar 2010 - 2 Sa 1293/09 - teilweise aufgehoben.
Die Berufung des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Gießen vom 16. April 2009 - 1 Ca 69/09 - wird im Umfang der Feststellung, dass das beklagte Land verpflichtet ist, dem Kläger Grundvergütung nach der Vergütungsgruppe III der Anlage 1a zum BAT nach der höchsten Lebensaltersstufe dieser Vergütungsgruppe für die Zeit vom 1. August 2008 bis zum 31. Dezember 2009 zu zahlen, als unzulässig verworfen.
Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Berufung und der Revision zu tragen.
1
Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das führende Parallelverfahren - 6 AZR 120/10 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .
| Fischermeier | Brühler | Spelge | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beus | Uwe Zabel |
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the plaintiff's appeal seeking a declaration of entitlement to base salary under pay group III at the highest age step for 1 August 2008 to 31 December 2009 was admissible.
That part of the appeal was inadmissible and had to be dismissed.
The judgment was issued without findings and reasons in light of the parallel lead case, and the revising court limited the appeal accordingly.
Allocation of costs of the appeal and revision proceedings.
The plaintiff had to bear the costs of the appeal and revision.
The partial setting aside and inadmissibility disposition led to cost liability of the plaintiff.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.