BAG 6 AZR 123/10•Appeal on wage claim partly dismissed as inadmissible
BAG 6 AZR 123/10Bag / Division 6Oct 19, 2010Modified
Extracted by Omnilex
The Federal Labour Court heard the defendant Land's revision in a wage dispute concerning the plaintiff's claim to base salary at the highest age step of pay group V b S for the period from 1 May 2008 to 31 December 2009. The Court partially set aside the judgment of the Hessian Labour Court and held that, insofar as the plaintiff sought a declaration on this wage entitlement, her appeal against the Marburg Labour Court judgment was inadmissible. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the appeal and revision proceedings. The parties waived a statement of facts and reasons because of a leading parallel case.
§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: In a leading parallel case, the parties may waive statement of facts and reasons; the court may decide accordingly. Where the appeal is directed only against a declaratory ruling on a wage entitlement, admissibility must be assessed autonomously for the challenged part of the judgment; if the admissibility requirements are lacking, the appeal is to be rejected as inadmissible in that extent. Costs of appeal and revision follow the outcome of the proceedings.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-10-19
Aktenzeichen: 6 AZR 123/10
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Marburg, 17. April 2009, Az: 2 Ca 86/09, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 6. Januar 2010, Az: 2 Sa 1122/09, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 6. Senat
Auf die Revision des beklagten Landes wird das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 6. Januar 2010 - 2 Sa 1122/09 - teilweise aufgehoben.
Die Berufung der Klägerin gegen das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Marburg vom 17. April 2009 - 2 Ca 86/09 - wird im Umfang der Feststellung, dass das beklagte Land verpflichtet ist, der Klägerin Grundvergütung nach der Vergütungsgruppe V b S der Anlage 1a zum BAT nach der höchsten Lebensaltersstufe dieser Vergütungsgruppe für die Zeit vom 1. Mai 2008 bis zum 31. Dezember 2009 zu zahlen, als unzulässig verworfen.
Die Klägerin hat die Kosten der Berufung und der Revision zu tragen.
1
Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das führende Parallelverfahren - 6 AZR 118/10 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .
| Fischermeier | Brühler | Spelge | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beus | Uwe Zabel |
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the revision led to partial annulment of the appellate judgment.
The Federal Labour Court partially set aside the judgment of the Hessian Labour Court.
The court granted the defendant Land's revision to that extent.
Whether the plaintiff's appeal against the first-instance judgment was admissible with respect to the declaratory claim for wage payment at the highest age step.
The appeal was dismissed as inadmissible in that scope.
The court limited the ruling to the part of the appeal concerning the declaration that the defendant had to pay base salary according to the highest age step of pay group V b S for the stated period.
Allocation of costs for the appellate and cassation proceedings.
The plaintiff had to bear the costs of the appeal and revision proceedings.
Costs followed the outcome of the partial success of the defendant Land and the inadmissibility of the plaintiff's appeal in the relevant part.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.