Key legal question
Whether the plaintiff's revision should be allowed.
Extracted holding
The revision was dismissed.
Extracted reasoning
The court rejected the revision without setting out the facts or reasons, relying on § 313a(1) ZPO.
projects
BAG 2 AZR 702/09•Revision dismissed; no reasons under § 313a ZPO
BAG 2 AZR 702/09Bag / Division 2Aug 12, 2010Dismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
The Federal Labor Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Thuringian Regional Labor Court and ordered the plaintiff to bear the costs. The decision was issued without a statement of facts or reasons pursuant to § 313a(1) ZPO.
§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO; dismissal of a revision without statement of facts and reasons. Where the court considers a full written reasoning unnecessary under § 313a(1) ZPO, it may dispense with the factual and legal grounds of the judgment. If the revision is dismissed, the costs of the revision proceedings are borne by the unsuccessful appellant.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-08-12
Aktenzeichen: 2 AZR 702/09
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Jena, 5. Oktober 2007, Az: 5 Ca 231/07, Urteilvorgehend Thüringer Landesarbeitsgericht, 1. April 2009, Az: 4 Sa 80/08, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 2. Senat
Die Revision der Klägerin gegen das Urteil des Thüringer Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 1. April 2009 - 4 Sa 80/08 - wird auf ihre Kosten zurückgewiesen.
1
Von der Darstellung des Tatbestandes und der Entscheidungsgründe wird abgesehen (§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO) .
| Eylert | Gallner | Berger | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Claes | Niebler |
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the plaintiff's revision should be allowed.
The revision was dismissed.
The court rejected the revision without setting out the facts or reasons, relying on § 313a(1) ZPO.
Allocation of the costs of the revision proceedings.
The plaintiff had to bear the costs of the revision.
Costs follow the dismissal of the revision.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.