Revision dismissed in labor law appeal

BAG 4 AZR 902/08Bag / Division 4May 19, 2010Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the plaintiff’s revision against the Hessian Regional Labor Court judgment. Because the parties waived findings of fact and reasons in light of parallel proceedings, the decision contains only the operative part. The court ordered the plaintiff to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons in parallel proceedings: where the parties expressly dispense with the statement of facts and reasons in view of leading parallel cases, the appellate court may issue a shortened judgment. The dispositive part remains fully effective; the omission of reasons does not affect the binding force of the decision or the allocation of costs.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 902/08, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-05-19

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 902/08

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Frankfurt, 8. November 2007, Az: 19 Ca 4658/07, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 2. Juli 2008, Az: 6/17 Sa 1883/07, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 2. Juli 2008 - 6/17 Sa 1883/07 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf die führenden Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 903/08 - und - 4 AZR 932/08 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO).

BeplerTreberWinter
GörgensTh. Hess

Keywords

revisioncostslabor law appealwaiver of reasonsparallel proceedings

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff’s revision against the appellate labor judgment was successful

Extracted holding

The revision was rejected.

Extracted reasoning

The decision contains only the dispositive part; no further reasons are stated because the parties waived findings and reasons in view of parallel proceedings.

Key legal question

Who bears the costs of the revision

Extracted holding

The plaintiff bears the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

The operative part expressly allocates the revision costs to the plaintiff.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.