BAG 8 AZR 108/08•Revision dismissed in transfer-of-undertaking dispute
BAG 8 AZR 108/08Bag / Division 8Apr 22, 2010Dismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
The Federal Labour Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Düsseldorf Regional Labour Court in a dispute concerning objection to a transfer of undertaking and alleged forfeiture. The judgment was issued without findings of fact and reasons because both parties had waived them. The court ordered the plaintiff to bear the costs of the revision.
§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 313a Abs. 1 S. 2 ZPO, § 555 Abs. 1 S. 1 ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons in appellate labour proceedings. If the parties validly waive the judgment's factual findings and reasons, the Federal Labour Court may render its judgment in shortened form; the revision is decided solely on the basis of the operative part and the procedural record available. A failed revision results in cost liability of the appellant.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-04-22
Aktenzeichen: 8 AZR 108/08
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Normen: § 72 Abs 5 ArbGG, § 313a Abs 1 S 2 ZPO, § 555 Abs 1 S 1 ZPO
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Solingen, 19. April 2007, Az: 1 Ca 1433/06 lev, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Düsseldorf, 14. November 2007, Az: 7 Sa 1074/07, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 8. Senat
Betriebsübergang - Widerspruch - Verwirkung - Urteil ohne Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe
Die Revision der Klägerin gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Düsseldorf vom 14. November 2007 - 7 Sa 1074/07 - wird zurückgewiesen.
Die Klägerin hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.
1
Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO).
| Hauck | Böck | Breinlinger | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F. Avenarius | Pauli |
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the plaintiff's revision against the Düsseldorf Regional Labour Court judgment was well-founded.
The revision was not successful and was dismissed.
The judgment was issued without findings of fact and reasons because the parties had waived them; the dispositive outcome was a confirmation of the lower court result through rejection of the revision.
Allocation of the costs of the revision.
The plaintiff had to bear the costs of the revision.
As the revision failed, costs were imposed on the appellant.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.