BAG 3 AZR 217/09•Revision dismissed in pension dispute
BAG 3 AZR 217/09Bag / Division 3Feb 16, 2010Dismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
The Federal Labour Court dismissed the defendant’s revision against the judgment of the Cologne Higher Labour Court. The parties had waived a statement of facts and reasons, so the decision contains no substantive discussion. The only dispositive points are the rejection of the revision and the allocation of the costs of the revision proceedings to the defendant.
Revision against a judgment of the Landesarbeitsgericht; dismissal of the revision and cost consequences. Where the parties waive the statement of facts and reasons, the Federal Labour Court may dispose of the case without reproducing the underlying factual findings. An unsuccessful revision is to be dismissed, and the revising party bears the costs of the revision proceedings.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-02-16
Aktenzeichen: 3 AZR 217/09
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Köln, 18. Januar 2008, Az: 2 Ca 265/07, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Köln, 12. Februar 2009, Az: 13 Sa 609/08, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 3. Senat
Die Revision des Beklagten gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Köln vom 12. Februar 2009 - 13 Sa 609/08 - wird zurückgewiesen.
Der Beklagte hat die Kosten des Revisionsverfahrens zu tragen.
1
Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet.
| Reinecke | Zwanziger | Schlewing | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schmidt | G. Kanzleiter |
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the defendant's revision against the Cologne Higher Labour Court judgment was admissible and well-founded.
The revision was unfounded and therefore dismissed.
No factual or legal reasons are reproduced in the decision because the parties waived the statement of facts and reasons.
Allocation of costs for the revision proceedings.
The defendant must bear the costs of the revision proceedings.
The unsuccessful revising party bears the costs.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.