BAG 3 AZR 223/09•Revision dismissed in employment pension dispute
BAG 3 AZR 223/09Bag / Division 3Feb 16, 2010Dismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
In this employment-law revision case, the Federal Labor Court dismissed the defendant’s appeal against the Cologne Higher Labor Court judgment. The published decision contains no findings of fact or reasons because the parties waived both. The only operative part is the rejection of the revision and the allocation of the costs of the revision proceedings to the defendant.
Revision dismissed; costs follow the unsuccessful revising party. Where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons, the published decision may be confined to the operative part. The revising party bears the costs of the revision proceedings when the revision is rejected (consid. tenor).
Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-02-16
Aktenzeichen: 3 AZR 223/09
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Köln, 18. Januar 2008, Az: 2 Ca 10802/06, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Köln, 12. Februar 2009, Az: 13 Sa 731/08, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 3. Senat
Die Revision des Beklagten gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Köln vom 12. Februar 2009 - 13 Sa 731/08 - wird zurückgewiesen.
Der Beklagte hat die Kosten des Revisionsverfahrens zu tragen.
1
Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet.
| Reinecke | Zwanziger | Schlewing | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schmidt | G. Kanzleiter |
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the defendant's revision against the Cologne Higher Labor Court judgment should succeed
The revision was unsuccessful and was dismissed.
No factual findings or reasons are provided in the published text; the tenor states only that the revision is rejected.
Allocation of costs of the revision proceedings
The defendant must bear the costs of the revision proceedings.
The tenor expressly places the costs of the revisional instance on the defendant.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.