Appeal partially granted; damages and costs against defendant

BGH X ZR 59/14Bgh / Civil Chamber 10Jun 9, 2015Modified

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The plaintiffs pursued appellate relief against judgments of the Hannover courts. The Federal Court of Justice, acting on the plaintiffs’ remedies, set aside the regional court judgment and amended the district court judgment by entering a new acknowledgment judgment. The defendant was ordered to pay each plaintiff EUR 400 with statutory default interest from 29 January 2013 and to indemnify them against pre-litigation legal costs of EUR 120.67. The defendant was also ordered to bear the costs of the proceedings.

Omnilex headnote

ZPO; recognition judgment on appeal; where the respondent acknowledges the claim, the appellate court sets aside the challenged decisions and enters a new judgment in accordance with the acknowledgment, including ancillary claims such as interest and pre-litigation costs, and allocates costs against the acknowledging party.

Full text

BGH — X ZR 59/14, Anerkenntnisurteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2015-06-09

Aktenzeichen: X ZR 59/14

Dokumenttyp: Anerkenntnisurteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend LG Hannover, 4. Juni 2014, Az: 6 S 4/14, Urteilvorgehend AG Hannover, 3. Dezember 2013, Az: 561 C 3773/13, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 10. Zivilsenat

Tenor

Auf die Rechtsmittel der Kläger werden das Urteil der 6. Zivilkammer des Landgerichts Hannover vom 4. Juni 2014 aufgehoben und das Urteil des Amtsgerichts Hannover vom 3. Dezember 2013 abgeändert und wie folgt neu gefasst:

Die Beklagte wird verurteilt, an die Kläger jeweils 400 € nebst Zinsen in Höhe von 5 Prozentpunkten über dem Basiszinssatz seit dem 29. Januar 2013 zu zahlen und die Kläger von vorgerichtlichen Rechtsverfolgungskosten in Höhe von 120,67 € freizustellen.

Die Beklagte trägt die Kosten des Rechtsstreits.

Meier-Beck Gröning Grabinski

Hoffmann Kober-Dehm

Keywords

acknowledgment judgmentappealinterestpre-litigation costscost allocation

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the lower-court judgments should be set aside and the defendant ordered to pay each plaintiff EUR 400 plus interest.

Extracted holding

Yes. The Federal Court set aside the regional court judgment, amended the district court judgment, and entered a new judgment ordering payment.

Extracted reasoning

The defendant recognized the claim; the Federal Court therefore entered an acknowledgment judgment consistent with the plaintiffs' claims.

Key legal question

Whether the defendant must reimburse pre-litigation legal enforcement costs of EUR 120.67.

Extracted holding

Yes. The defendant was ordered to release the plaintiffs from these costs.

Extracted reasoning

The acknowledged claim also covered ancillary pre-litigation recovery costs.

Key legal question

Who bears the costs of the litigation.

Extracted holding

The defendant bears the costs of the proceedings.

Extracted reasoning

The defendant’s acknowledgment led to allocation of costs against it.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.