projects

Reconsideration against denial of hearing complaint rejected

BGH V ZA 35/10Bgh / Civil Chamber VSep 7, 2011Dismissed

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Bundesgerichtshof rejected the applicant's reconsideration (Gegenvorstellung) against the order of 29 July 2011 that had dismissed his hearing complaint. The Senate held that the submission gave no reason to change the prior decision and that the applicant's compensation argument had already been considered but was not persuasive.

Omnilex headnote

Gegenvorstellung against an order dismissing an Anhörungsrüge; reconsideration is unsuccessful where the court has already considered the decisive argument and finds no basis for altering its prior decision. A mere repetition or recharacterization of submissions, including an argument of compensation, does not compel amendment of the earlier order (consid. 1).

Full text

BGH — V ZA 35/10, Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-09-07

Aktenzeichen: V ZA 35/10

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Vorinstanz: vorgehend BGH, 29. Juli 2011, Az: V ZA 35/10, Beschlussvorgehend BGH, 19. Mai 2011, Az: V ZA 35/10, Beschlussvorgehend OLG München, 26. Oktober 2010, Az: 5 U 2320/10vorgehend LG München I, 4. März 2010, Az: 22 O 21972/99

Spruchkörper: 5. Zivilsenat

Tenor

Die Gegenvorstellung des Antragstellers gegen den Beschluss des Senats vom 29. Juli 2011 wird zurückgewiesen.

Gründe

1 Die Gegenvorstellung des Antragstellers gegen den seine Anhörungsrüge zurückweisenden Beschluss des Senats vom 29. Juli 2011 gibt keinen Anlass für eine abändernde Entscheidung. Der Senat hat bei seiner Entscheidung auch die von dem Antragsteller gegen das Berufungsurteil vorgebrachte Argumentation zur „Kompensation“ berücksichtigt, aber nicht für durchgreifend erachtet.

Lemke Schmidt-Räntsch Stresemann

Brückner Weinland

Keywords

reconsiderationhearing complaintcivil procedureappellate procedurecompensation argument

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the applicant's reconsideration of the order denying his hearing complaint warranted amendment of the prior decision.

Extracted holding

The reconsideration presented no grounds for altering the prior order; the applicant's compensation argument had already been considered and found unpersuasive.

Extracted reasoning

The Senate stated that it had taken the applicant's compensation argument into account when deciding the hearing complaint, but it was not convincing and therefore did not justify a different outcome.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.