projects

Hearing complaint rejected; no failure to consider submissions

BVerwG 4 BN 9/10, 4 BN 9/10 (4 BN 68/09)Bverwg / Division 4Mar 3, 2010Dismissed

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court rejected the applicants' hearing complaint against its order of 2010-02-04. It held that the complaint did not demonstrate any failure to consider the applicants' submissions in case 4 BN 68.09; instead, it merely attacked the alleged substantive error of the earlier refusal of leave to appeal, which is not reviewable by this remedy. The court ordered the applicants to bear the costs.

Omnilex headnote

§ 152a VwGO; hearing complaint requires showing a violation of the right to be heard, not merely an alleged substantive error of the prior decision. The remedy is unsuccessful if the complainant only argues that the court decided the non-admission complaint wrongly on the merits and does not substantiate that submissions were not noticed or considered (consid. 1). Cost allocation follows § 154(2) and § 159 sentence 2 VwGO; no separate value determination is required where the court fee results from No. 5400 KV GKG (consid. 2).

Full text

BVerwG — 4 BN 9/10, 4 BN 9/10 (4 BN 68/09), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-03-03

Aktenzeichen: 4 BN 9/10, 4 BN 9/10 (4 BN 68/09)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Vorinstanz: nachgehend BVerfG, 10. Mai 2010, Az: 1 BvR 792/10, Nichtannahmebeschluss

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

Die Anhörungsrüge der Antragsteller gegen den Beschluss des Senats vom 4. Februar 2010 wird zurückgewiesen.

Die Antragsteller tragen die Kosten des Verfahrens als

Gründe

1 Die Anhörungsrüge bleibt ohne Erfolg, weil sich aus ihr nicht ergibt, dass der Senat die Ausführungen der Antragsteller im Verfahren BVerwG 4 BN 68.09 nicht zur Kenntnis genommen und in Erwägung gezogen hat. Mit ihr kann nicht geltend gemacht werden, der Senat habe die Nichtzulassungsbeschwerde in der Sache unrichtig entschieden.

2 Die Kostenentscheidung beruht auf § 154 Abs. 2, § 159 Satz 2 VwGO. Einer Streitwertentscheidung bedarf es nicht; die Gerichtsgebühr ergibt sich aus Nr. 5400 KV GKG.

Keywords

hearing complaintright to be heardnon-admission complaintcostscourt fees

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the hearing complaint against the Senate's order of 2010-02-04 was well founded.

Extracted holding

The complaint was unfounded because it did not show that the Senate failed to take the applicants' submissions into account; it cannot be used to challenge the substantive correctness of the refusal to grant leave to appeal.

Extracted reasoning

A hearing complaint succeeds only if the court did not take submissions into account. The applicants merely attacked the merits of the earlier decision, which is not the function of this remedy.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.