Whether the litigation costs should be imposed on the defendants or the plaintiff.
The plaintiff must bear the costs of the litigation.
25 T 173/17•Allocation of litigation costs after appeal
25 T 173/17Court of First InstanceJun 21, 2017Civil lawModified
Extracted by Omnilex
The defendants appealed a Remscheid Local Court order dated 27 January 2017, challenging the part that imposed the litigation costs on them. The Düsseldorf Local Court amended that cost ruling and instead ordered the plaintiff to bear the costs of the litigation. It also ordered the plaintiff to bear the costs of the appeal proceedings.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-06-21
Aktenzeichen: 25 T 173/17
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGD:2017:0621.25T173.17.00
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Spruchkörper: 25. Beschwerdekammer
Auf die Beschwerde der Beklagten wird der Beschluss des Amtsgerichts Remscheid vom 27. Januar 2017, soweit er die Kosten des Rechtsstreits den Beklagten auferlegt, abgeändert.
Die Kosten des Rechtsstreits werden der Klägerin auferlegt.
Die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens trägt die Klägerin.
Whether the litigation costs should be imposed on the defendants or the plaintiff.
The plaintiff must bear the costs of the litigation.
Allocation of the costs of the appeal proceedings.
The plaintiff must bear the costs of the appeal proceedings.
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.