The plaintiff’s claim against the defendant.
The claim was dismissed.
39 C 8762/98•Dismissal of the claim and allocation of costs
Dismissal of the claim and allocation of costsAI generated
39 C 8762/98Court of First InstanceOct 15, 1998Civil lawDismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
Omnilex summary AI generated
In this first-instance civil case, Düsseldorf Local Court (39 C 8762/98), following an oral hearing on 27 August 1998, dismissed the plaintiff’s claim. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the proceedings. The judgment was declared provisionally enforceable as to costs without security. The plaintiff may avert enforcement by providing security equal to 110% of the amount enforceable, unless the defendant provides security in the same amount. Security may also take the form of an unconditional, unlimited guarantee from a German major bank or savings bank. The judgment was given by Judge X on 15 October 1998.
Full text
Amtsgericht Düsseldorf — 39 C 8762/98 — Urteil
Entscheidungsdatum: 1998-10-15
Aktenzeichen: 39 C 8762/98
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGD:1998:1015.39C8762.98.00
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Spruchkörper: 39. Abteilung
Tenor
hat das Amtsgericht Düsseldorf
auf die mündliche Verhandlung vom 27. August 1998
durch die Richterin X
für R e c h t erkannt:
Die Klage wird abgewiesen.
Die Kosten des Rechtsstreits trägt der Kläger.
Das Urteil ist wegen der Kosten ohne Sicherheitsleistung vorläufig vollstreckbar.
Dem Kläger wird nachgelassen, die Vollstreckung durch Leistung einer Sicher-
heit in Höhe von 110 % des zu vollstreckenden Betrages abzuwenden, wenn
nicht die Beklagte vor der Vollstreckung Sicherheit in gleicher Höhe leiste.
Die Sicherheit kann auch durch selbstschuldnerische, unbefristete Bürgschaft
einer deutschen Großbank oder Sparkasse erbracht werden.
Keywords
claim dismissalcost allocationprovisional enforceabilitysecurity
Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex
Allocation of the costs of the proceedings.
The plaintiff must bear the costs of the proceedings.
Provisional enforceability of the judgment as to costs and the plaintiff’s right to avert enforcement by providing security.
The judgment is provisionally enforceable as to costs without security; the plaintiff may avert enforcement by providing security of 110% of the amount enforceable, unless the defendant provides security in the same amount.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.