Whether supervisory guardianship should be ordered and a guardian appointed to assert rights against the attorney-in-fact.
Guardianship was ordered, and the guardian’s remit was limited to asserting rights against the attorney-in-fact.
36 XVII 239/15•Requirements for ordering supervisory guardianship
Requirements for ordering supervisory guardianshipAI generated
36 XVII 239/15Court of First InstanceJun 27, 2016Civil lawGranted
Extracted by Omnilex
Omnilex summary AI generated
On 27 June 2016, Bonn Local Court ordered guardianship under §§ 1908i and 1896(3) BGB. It appointed attorney W C1 as a professional guardian, limiting the assigned area of responsibility to asserting rights against the person’s attorney-in-fact.
Omnilex headnote
BGB § 1896(3); requirements for supervisory guardianship. The court may order a guardianship limited to asserting the rights of a person subject to guardianship against an attorney-in-fact. The operative order identifies that limited area of responsibility and appoints a professional guardian. The decision states the result but provides no further reasoning on the substantive requirements or their application.
Full text
Amtsgericht Bonn — 36 XVII 239/15 — Beschluss
Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-06-27
Aktenzeichen: 36 XVII 239/15
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGBN:2016:0627.36XVII239.15.00
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Spruchkörper: 36. Betreuungsabteilung
Normen: BGB § 1896 Abs. 3
Leitsätze
Zu den Voraussetzungen einer Kontrollbetreuung
Tenor
wird eine Betreuung gemäß §§ 1908i, 1896 Abs. 3 BGB angeordnet.
Zum Betreuer wird Herr Rechtsanwalt W C1, U-Straße ##, ##### C als Berufsbetreuer bestellt.
Die Bestellung umfasst folgenden Aufgabenkreis:
Geltendmachung von Rechten gegenüber der/dem Bevollmächtigten
Keywords
guardianshipsupervisory guardianshipattorney-in-factprofessional guardian
Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.