99 IN 153/13•Concrete proof of disadvantage required to oppose an insolvency plan
99 IN 153/13Court of First InstanceMay 27, 2014Insolvency lawDismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
Shareholder U Y, represented by lawyer T E, applied at the 20 March 2014 hearing for refusal of confirmation of the insolvency plan dated 19 March 2014. He alleged that the plan would leave him worse off. The Bonn Local Court rejected the application under InsO § 251, holding that the alleged disadvantage had to be supported by specific facts made credible. Mere assumptions and general forecasts did not meet that requirement.
InsO § 251; alleged disadvantage under an insolvency plan. A party relying on disadvantage as grounds to oppose confirmation must substantiate the claimed disadvantage with concrete facts and make those facts credible. Mere conjecture or general prognoses do not suffice.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-05-27
Aktenzeichen: 99 IN 153/13
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGBN:2014:0527.99IN153.13.00
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Spruchkörper: 99. Insolvenzabteilung
Normen: InsO § 251
Die behauptete Schlechterstellung duch den Insolvenzplan ist mit konkreten Tatsachen zu begründen, die glaubhaft zu machen sind. Der Hinweis auf Vermutungen und allgemeine Prognosen ist nicht ausreichend.
wird der durch den Anteilsinhaber Herrn U Y, B N-Weg ##, ##### L, vertreten durch Herrn Rechtsanwalt T E, C-Weg ##-##, ##### E1, im Termin am 20.3.2014 eingereichte Antrag (ohne Datum) auf Versagung der Bestätigung des Insolvenzplans vom 19.03.2014 zurückgewiesen.
Whether the shareholder's application to refuse confirmation of the insolvency plan established that the plan would place him in a worse position.
A disadvantage must be supported by specific facts that are made credible; conjecture and general forecasts are insufficient.
The applicant relied on assumptions and general predictions rather than substantiating the alleged disadvantage with specific facts made credible.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.