Validity of the TOP 2 resolution on the 2001 annual accounts, concerning the total annual account item “written-off receivables T” and the individual accounts in their entirety.
The resolution is invalid to that extent.
28 II 126/02 WEG•Validity of condominium resolutions on annual accounts and special assessment
Validity of condominium resolutions on annual accounts and special assessmentAI generated
28 II 126/02 WEGCourt of First InstanceJul 11, 2003Civil lawPartially granted
Extracted by Omnilex
Omnilex summary AI generated
The Bonn Local Court partly upheld the applicants’ challenge to resolutions adopted at the condominium owners’ meeting on 18 June 2002. It declared the TOP 2 resolution on the 2001 annual accounts invalid with respect to the total-account item “written-off receivables T” and the individual accounts in their entirety. It also invalidated the TOP 3 special-assessment resolution. The applicants’ declaratory application was dismissed as inadmissible. The applicants were charged 19% of court costs and the respondents 81%; no out-of-court costs were reimbursed.
Full text
Amtsgericht Bonn — 28 II 126/02 WEG — Beschluss
Entscheidungsdatum: 2003-07-11
Aktenzeichen: 28 II 126/02 WEG
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGBN:2003:0711.28II126.02WEG.00
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Spruchkörper: Abt. 28 WEG
Tenor
Der Beschluss der Wohnungseigentümerversammlung vom 18. Juni 2002 zu TOP 2 (Jahresabrechnung 2001) wird bezüglich der Gesamtjahresab-rechnung hinsichtlich der Position "ausgebuchte Forderungen T" und hinsichtlich der Einzelabrechnungen insgesamt für ungültig erklärt.
Der Beschluss der selben Eigentümerversammlung zu TOP 3 (Son-derumlage) wird für ungültig erklärt.
Der Feststellungsantrag wird als unzulässig abgewiesen.
Von den Gerichtskosten tragen die Antragsteller 19 % und die Antrags-gegner 81 %; außergerichtliche Kosten werden nicht erstatten.
Der Geschäftswert wird auf 5.825,81 Euro festgesetzt.
Keywords
condominium ownershipowners’ meetingannual accountsspecial assessmentresolution validitydeclaratory applicationadmissibilitycost allocation
Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex
Validity of the TOP 3 resolution imposing a special assessment.
The resolution is invalid.
Admissibility of the declaratory application.
The declaratory application is inadmissible.
Allocation of court costs and out-of-court costs.
Applicants bear 19% and respondents 81% of court costs; out-of-court costs are not reimbursed.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.