Compulsory administration does not remove a landlord’s standing as defendant

20 C 457/05Court of First InstanceApr 26, 2006Tenancy lawOther

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

In this ruling, the Kerpen District Court addressed the effect of compulsory administration on a landlord’s standing as defendant in passive litigation. It held that the appointment of a compulsory administrator does not remove that standing, at least where the main matter has already become moot. The decision text provided does not identify the parties or describe the underlying dispute.

Omnilex headnote

The appointment of a compulsory administrator does not, in passive litigation, remove the landlord’s standing as defendant. This applies at least after the main matter has become moot.

Full text

Amtsgericht Kerpen — 20 C 457/05 — Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2006-04-26

Aktenzeichen: 20 C 457/05

ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGBM3:2006:0426.20C457.05.00

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Spruchkörper: Abt. 20

Leitsätze

Die Anordnung der Zwangsverwaltung führt in Passivprozessen - jedenfalls nach erledigter Hauptsache - nicht zum Wegfall der Passivlegitimation des Vermieters.

Tenor

Die Anordnung der Zwangsverwaltung führt in Passivprozessen - jedenfalls nach erledigter Hauptsache - nicht zum Wegfall der Passivlegitimation des Vermieters.

Keywords

compulsory administrationlandlordstanding as defendantpassive litigationmootness

No. The appointment of a compulsory administrator does not remove the landlord’s standing as defendant, at least after the main matter has become moot.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.