Whether the parties’ marriage should be dissolved.
The marriage was dissolved.
33 F 36/96•Divorce, parental residence rights, and financial equalization
Divorce, parental residence rights, and financial equalizationAI generated
33 F 36/96Court of First InstanceJan 19, 2005Family lawPartially granted
Extracted by Omnilex
Omnilex summary AI generated
In this first-instance family judgment, the Brühl Local Court dissolved the parties’ marriage, solemnized on 7 October 1983. It assigned the respondent the right to determine the residence of the parties’ daughter. The respondent was ordered to pay the applicant EUR 40,020.01 in equalization of accrued gains by 30 September 2005, with interest from the divorce becoming final. The court also ordered the transfer of monthly pension entitlements valued at EUR 76.50 as of 30 April 1996, to be converted into earnings points. The parties’ costs were offset against each other.
Full text
Amtsgericht Brühl — 33 F 36/96 — Urteil
Entscheidungsdatum: 2005-01-19
Aktenzeichen: 33 F 36/96
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGBM2:2005:0119.33F36.96.00
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Spruchkörper: Abt. 33
Tenor
I. Die am 07.10.1983 vor dem Standesbeamten in P unter Heiratsregister-Nr. 00/0000 geschlossene Ehe der Parteien wird geschieden.
II. Der Antragsgegnerin wird das Aufenthaltsbestimmungsrecht über die gemeinsame Tochter E , geb. am 00.00.0000 , übertragen.
III. Die Antragsgegnerin wird verurteilt, an den Antragsteller zum Ausgleich des Zugewinns 40 020,01 EUR zu zahlen, fällig zum 30.09.2005, nebst Zinsen in Höhe von 5 % Punkte über dem Basiszinsatz ab Rechtskraft der Scheidung.
IV. Vorn Rentenkonto Nr.: 00 000000 T 000 des Antragstellers bei der Bundesversicherungsanstalt für Angestellte in C werden monatliche Rentenanwartschaften in Höhe von 76,50 EUR bezogen auf den 30.04.1996 auf das Rentenkonto Nr.: 00 000000 O 000 der Antragsgegnerin bei der Bundesversicherungsanstalt für Angestellte in Berlin übertragen.
Die zu übertragenden Rentenanwartschaften sind in Entgeltpunkte umzurechnen.
V. Die Kosten des Verfahrens werden gegeneinander aufgehoben.
Keywords
divorceparental responsibilityresidence determinationequalization of accrued gainspension equalizationcost allocation
Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex
Who should hold the right to determine the daughter’s residence.
The respondent was granted the right to determine the daughter’s residence.
Whether the respondent owed the applicant equalization of accrued gains, and in what amount.
The respondent must pay the applicant EUR 40,020.01, due by 30 September 2005, with interest at five percentage points above the base rate from the divorce becoming final.
How the parties’ pension entitlements should be divided.
Monthly pension entitlements of EUR 76.50, calculated as of 30 April 1996, were transferred from the applicant’s account to the respondent’s account and are to be converted into earnings points.
How the costs of the proceedings should be allocated.
The parties’ costs were offset against each other.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.