Criminal liability for theft
The accused was convicted of theft.
336 Ls 4/19•Youth sentence for theft, property damage and fare evasion
Youth sentence for theft, property damage and fare evasionAI generated
336 Ls 4/19Court of First InstanceJul 31, 2019Criminal lawPartially granted
Extracted by Omnilex
Omnilex summary AI generated
Aachen District Court convicted the accused of theft, property damage and fare evasion, acquitting him of the remaining charges. It imposed a youth sentence of two years and eight months, including the sentence in the judgment of AG W. dated 21 December 2017 (337 Ls 150/17). The state treasury was ordered to bear the procedural costs, while expenses were reimbursable only insofar as the accused was acquitted. The decision cites the relevant Criminal Code and Youth Courts Act provisions but gives no further factual or sentencing reasoning in the provided text.
Full text
Amtsgericht Aachen — 336 Ls 4/19 — Anerkenntnisurteil
Entscheidungsdatum: 2019-07-31
Aktenzeichen: 336 Ls 4/19
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGAC1:2019:0731.336LS4.19.00
Dokumenttyp: Anerkenntnisurteil
Spruchkörper: Richter am Amtsgericht
Tenor
Der Angeklagte wird – unter Freisprechung im Übrigen – wegen Diebstahls, wegen Sachbeschädigung und wegen Beförderungserschleichung unter Einbeziehung des Urteils des AG W. vom 21.12.2017 – 337 Ls 150/17 – zu einer Jugendstrafe von 2 Jahren und 8 Monaten verurteilt.
Die Staatskasse trägt die Verfahrenskosten. Auslagen werden nur erstattet, soweit Freispruch erfolgte.
§ 242, 243 I Nr. 2, 265 a, 303, 303 c, 25 II, 53 StGB, 105 JGG
Keywords
theftproperty damagefare evasionyouth sentenceacquittalcost allocation
Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex
Criminal liability for property damage
The accused was convicted of property damage.
Criminal liability for obtaining transportation without payment
The accused was convicted of fare evasion.
Remaining charges
The accused was acquitted of the remaining charges.
Youth sentence, including the 2017 judgment
A youth sentence of two years and eight months was imposed, including the judgment of AG W. dated 21 December 2017.
Allocation of procedural costs and reimbursement of expenses
The state treasury bears the procedural costs; expenses are reimbursed only to the extent of the acquittal.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.