Key legal question
Whether the appeal complied with the duty to provide reasons under Art. 321(1) CPC
Extracted holding
The appeal did not contain any meaningful challenge to the non-entry decision and therefore lacked the required motivation.
Extracted reasoning
A missing motivation cannot be cured like a formal defect such as lack of signature. The filing discussed the underlying debt dispute, contained no conclusions, and did not explain why the challenged non-entry decision was wrong.