Appeal withdrawn in forest boundary determination case

90.2002.78Other CourtSep 24, 2003Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The appellant filed an appeal against a State Council resolution concerning the determination of the forest limit adjacent to the buildable zone in a municipality. By letter of 4 September 2003, the appellant withdrew the appeal. The Territorial Planning Court therefore struck the appeal from the docket and ordered that no fees or costs be levied.

Omnilex headnote

Withdrawal of an appeal before the planning court leads to removal of the case from the docket; where the appeal is withdrawn, the court terminates the proceedings without imposing court fees or costs, absent contrary reasons stated in the decision.

Full text

AIUTO RICERCA

Anteprima di stampa

Numero d'incarto: 90.2002.78

Data decisione, Autorità: 24.09.2003, TPT

Incarto n. 90.2002.78

Lugano 24 settembre 2003

In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il Presidente del Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Raffaello Balerna

assistito dalla segretaria:

Sonja Federspiel, vicecancelliera

statuendo sul ricorso 31 maggio 2002 di

__________ __________, __________

contro

la risoluzione n. __________ del 7 maggio 2002 del Consiglio di Stato in materia di accertamento del limite del bosco a contatto con la zona edificabile nel Comune di __________;

preso atto che, con lettera del 4 settembre 2003, la ricorrente ha comunicato al Tribunale di ritirare l'impugnativa;

decreta:

  1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.

  2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

  3. Intimazione a:

; Municipio di __________, __________ __________; Consiglio di Stato, __________ __________; Dipartimento del territorio, Sezione forestale cantonale, __________ __________.

Il presidente La segretaria

del Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026

  |  Informazioni legali  |  Requisiti minimi  |  Contatta il webmaster

Keywords

withdrawalappealplanningforest boundarycourt costsdocket removal

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the appeal should be removed from the docket after withdrawal.

Extracted holding

Yes. The court struck the appeal from the docket following the appellant's withdrawal letter.

Extracted reasoning

The court noted the withdrawal communicated by letter of 4 September 2003 and therefore discontinued the proceeding by striking it from the docket.

Key legal question

Whether court fees and costs should be charged.

Extracted holding

No fees or costs were imposed.

Extracted reasoning

After the withdrawal, the court ordered that no taxes or expenses be levied.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.