Appeal withdrawn; case struck off as moot

90.1995.92Other CourtOct 5, 1999Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The appellant challenged the State Council’s approval of a zoning-plan amendment concerning an inventory of buildings outside building zones. After filing observations, the appellant informed the court by letter of 27 September 1999 that the appeal was withdrawn. The Planning Court held that the case had become moot and ordered the appeal struck from the docket. It also decided that no fees or costs would be collected.

Omnilex headnote

Withdrawal of an appeal; mootness and removal from the docket; no costs where the proceedings lose their subject matter after an express withdrawal. Once the appellant unequivocally withdraws the challenge, the court no longer has a live dispute to adjudicate and must strike the matter off the rolls (consid. implicit). In such circumstances, absent a substantive adjudication, the court may dispense with the collection of court fees and expenses.

Full text

AIUTO RICERCA

Anteprima di stampa

Numero d'incarto: 90.1995.92

Data decisione, Autorità: 05.10.1999, TPT

Incarto n. 90.95.00092

Lugano 5 ottobre 1999

In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici:

Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario

Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 6 giugno 1995 di

__________ __________, __________,

contro

la risoluzione _________ marzo 1995 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva la variante di Piano Regolatore concernente l’inventario degli edifici situati fuori dalle zone edificabili del Comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 15 novembre 1995 del Consiglio di Stato e 5 agosto 1996 del Comune di Aurigeno;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 27 settembre 1999 il ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

  1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

  2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

  3. Intimazione a:

  • _________ _________, _________

Municipio di _________

Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario

Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026

  |  Informazioni legali  |  Requisiti minimi  |  Contatta il webmaster

Keywords

planningwithdrawalmootnessstruck outcostszoning plan

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the appeal should still be decided after the appellant withdrew it.

Extracted holding

The appeal no longer had a subject matter and had to be removed from the docket.

Extracted reasoning

By letter of 27 September 1999 the appellant expressly withdrew the challenge, so the proceedings became devoid of object.

Key legal question

Whether court fees and costs should be charged.

Extracted holding

No fees or costs were levied.

Extracted reasoning

Because the case was struck off after withdrawal and became moot, the court ordered no taxes or expenses.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.