Petition withdrawn; case struck out with no costs

53.1995.6Other CourtFeb 11, 1997Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The petitioner withdrew the administrative petition on 30 January 1997. The Tribunal cantonal administrative held that the proceedings were therefore exhausted and ordered the case struck from the docket. It further decided that no court fees and no expenses would be charged.

Omnilex headnote

Withdrawal of the petition renders the proceedings moot; the court strikes the case from the docket and may waive costs where the procedure is thereby concluded. The merits are not adjudicated once the claimant validly withdraws the request (consid. implicit).

Full text

AIUTO RICERCA

Anteprima di stampa

Numero d'incarto: 53.1995.6

Data decisione, Autorità: 11.02.1997, TRAM

Incarto n. 53.95.00006

Lugano 11 febbraio 1997

In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

composto dei giudici:

Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna, Stefano Bernasconi

segretario:

Leopoldo Crivelli

statuendo sulla petizione 8 settembre 1994 di


patrocinata da: avv. __________

contro

lo Stato della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino;

preso atto che in data 30 gennaio 1997 il patrocinatore dell'attrice ha comunicato di ritirare la petizione;

considerato pertanto che il procedimento è così esaurito;

decreta:

  1. La petizione è stralciata dai ruoli.

  2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.

  3. Intimazione a:


Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

Il presidente Il segretario

Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026

  |  Informazioni legali  |  Requisiti minimi  |  Contatta il webmaster

Keywords

withdrawalstruck outadministrative procedurecostsmootness

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the petition should be removed from the docket after withdrawal.

Extracted holding

Yes. Because the petitioner withdrew the petition, the proceedings were considered exhausted and the case was struck from the docket.

Extracted reasoning

The court noted the withdrawal communicated by counsel and concluded that the procedural purpose had ceased, so no further decision on the merits was necessary.

Key legal question

Whether court fees or expenses should be charged.

Extracted holding

No. The court ordered that neither fees nor expenses be levied.

Extracted reasoning

Given the termination of the proceedings following withdrawal, the court dispensed with costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.