Appeal withdrawn; case struck out without costs

52.2005.27Other CourtFeb 8, 2005Withdrawn

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The applicant appealed a decision of the LEPIC supervisory commission ordering suspension of works. Before the court ruled on the merits, the applicant withdrew the appeal by letter of 4 February 2005. The Administrative Court therefore struck the matter from its docket and ordered that no court fees or costs be charged.

Omnilex headnote

Appeal withdrawn; the court strikes the case from the docket and closes the proceedings. In the absence of a merits decision after withdrawal, the court may simply take note of the renunciation and terminate the case. Where the proceedings end in this manner, no court fees or expenses are charged if the court so orders (consid. implied).

Full text

AIUTO RICERCA

Anteprima di stampa

Numero d'incarto: 52.2005.27

Data decisione, Autorità: 08.02.2005, TRAM

Incarto n. 52.2005.27

Lugano 8 febbraio 2005

In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il presidente del Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

Lorenzo Anastasi

assistito dal segretario:

Leopoldo Crivelli

statuendo sul ricorso 31 gennaio 2005 della

RI 1

contro

la decisione 25 gennaio 2005 della Commissione di vigilanza LEPIC, con la quale intimava all'insorgente l'ordine di sospensione dei lavori;

preso atto che la ricorrente, con scritto 4 febbraio 2005, ha comunicato di ritirare il ricorso;

considerato pertanto che il procedimento è così esaurito;

decreta:

  1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.

  2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.

  3. Intimazione a:

.

terzi implicati

CO 1

Il presidente Il segretario

del Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026

  |  Informazioni legali  |  Requisiti minimi  |  Contatta il webmaster

Keywords

withdrawalstrike-outcourt costsadministrative appealworks suspension

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the appeal should be continued after the appellant withdrew it.

Extracted holding

The proceedings were terminated and the appeal was struck from the docket because the appellant withdrew the appeal.

Extracted reasoning

After the withdrawal letter of 4 February 2005, the court held that the proceedings were exhausted.

Key legal question

Whether court fees and costs should be charged.

Extracted holding

No court fees or costs were levied.

Extracted reasoning

Because the proceedings ended through withdrawal, the court ordered no fees or expenses.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.