52.2002.180•Appeal withdrawn; case struck from the docket
52.2002.180Other CourtMay 13, 2002Withdrawn
Extracted by Omnilex
The appellant appealed a municipal decision annulling a tender concerning sun-shade works for school enlargement. Before the administrative court decided the merits, the appellant notified on 3 May 2002 that it was withdrawing the appeal. The president of the Cantonal Administrative Court therefore held that the proceedings were exhausted, struck the appeal from the docket, and ordered that no fees or costs be charged.
Appeal withdrawn before judgment; proceedings become moot and are struck from the docket. Where the appellant validly withdraws the appeal, the court no longer rules on the merits and terminates the case without assessing the challenged administrative measure. In the absence of a merits decision, costs may be left uncharged, as ordered by the court (consid. 1-2).
AIUTO RICERCA
Anteprima di stampa
Numero d'incarto: 52.2002.180
Data decisione, Autorità: 13.05.2002, TRAM
Incarto n. 52.2002.00180
Lugano 13 maggio 2002
In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino
Il presidente del Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
Lorenzo Anastasi
assistito dal segretario:
Leopoldo Crivelli
statuendo sul ricorso 16 aprile 2002 della
contro
la decisione 12 aprile 2002 del Comune di ______, che annulla il concorso relativo alle opere da elementi frangisole inerenti l'ampliamento delle scuole __________ di __________;
preso atto che il 3 maggio 2002 la ricorrente ha comunicato di ritirare il ricorso;
considerato pertanto che il procedimento è così esaurito;
decreta:
Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.
Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.
Intimazione a:
Il presidente del Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
Il segretario
Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026
| Informazioni legali | Requisiti minimi | Contatta il webmaster
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the appeal should remain pending after the appellant withdrew it.
The proceedings were terminated because the appeal was withdrawn.
After the appellant’s notice of withdrawal on 3 May 2002, the case was considered exhausted.
How the costs of the withdrawn appeal should be allocated.
No court fees or costs were charged.
Because the proceedings ended upon withdrawal, the court ordered no fees or expenses.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.