Appeal withdrawn; case struck from the roll

52.2001.344Other CourtSep 27, 2001Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The appellant challenged a 4 September 2001 Council of State decision concerning a building permit for electrifying folding doors and maintenance works on garages. After the appeal was filed, counsel informed the court on 27 September 2001 that the appeal was withdrawn. The Administrative Court therefore held that the proceedings were exhausted, struck the appeal from the roll, and ordered that no fees or costs be levied.

Omnilex headnote

Withdrawal of an administrative appeal renders the proceedings moot and leads to removal of the case from the docket; absent a substantive determination, the court may order that no court fees or costs be imposed.

Full text

AIUTO RICERCA

Anteprima di stampa

Numero d'incarto: 52.2001.344

Data decisione, Autorità: 27.09.2001, TRAM

Incarto n. 52.2001.00344

Lugano 27 settembre 2001

In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il presidente del Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

Lorenzo Anastasi

assistito dal segretario:

Leopoldo Crivelli

statuendo sul ricorso 26 settembre 2001 di

__________ patr. da: avv. __________

contro

la decisione 4 settembre 2001, no. 4167, del Consiglio di Stato, concernente la licenza edilizia per l'elettrificazione delle porte basculanti e interventi di manutenzione delle autorimesse al mappale no. __________ RFD __________;

preso atto che il 27 settembre 2001 la patrocinatrice del ricorrente ha comunicato di ritirare il ricorso;

considerato pertanto che il procedimento è così esaurito;

decreta:

  1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.

  2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.

  3. Intimazione a:

Il presidente del Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

Il segretario

Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026

  |  Informazioni legali  |  Requisiti minimi  |  Contatta il webmaster

Keywords

appeal withdrawaladministrative procedurebuilding permitstrike outcourt costsmootness

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the appeal should remain pending after withdrawal by the appellant's counsel.

Extracted holding

The appeal was removed from the docket because the withdrawal exhausted the proceedings.

Extracted reasoning

Once the appellant's lawyer notified the court of the withdrawal, there was no longer any live dispute to decide.

Key legal question

Whether court fees or costs should be charged after the withdrawal.

Extracted holding

No court fees or costs were levied.

Extracted reasoning

Given the procedural termination following withdrawal, the court ordered the matter to be closed without costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.