Appeal withdrawn in fiscal equalization dispute

52.1998.7Other CourtMar 6, 1998Withdrawn

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The appellant filed an appeal on 14 January 1998 against a December 1997 decision of the Department of Institutions, Section of Local Authorities, concerning fiscal equalization for 1997. On 17 February 1998, the appellant withdrew the appeal. The Administrative Court therefore struck the case from the roll and ordered that no fees or costs be levied.

Omnilex headnote

Withdrawal of appeal; proceedings are terminated when the appellant withdraws the remedy, and the case is struck from the roll. In such a situation, the court may order that no court fees or costs be charged (consid. implicit).

Full text

AIUTO RICERCA

Anteprima di stampa

Numero d'incarto: 52.1998.7

Data decisione, Autorità: 06.03.1998, TRAM

Incarto n. 52.98.00007

Lugano 6 marzo 1998

In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

composto dei giudici:

Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna, Stefano Bernasconi

segretario:

Leopoldo Crivelli

statuendo sul ricorso 14 gennaio 1998 del


Contro

La decisione dicembre 1997 del Dipartimento delle istituzioni, sezione degli enti locali, relativa al livellamento della potenzialità fiscale 1997;

preso atto che in data 17 febbraio 1998 il ricorrente ha comunicato di ritirare il ricorso;

considerato pertanto che il procedimento è così esaurito;

decreta:

  1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.

  2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.

  3. Intimazione a:


Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

Il presidente Il segretario

Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026

  |  Informazioni legali  |  Requisiti minimi  |  Contatta il webmaster

Keywords

appeal withdrawalstriking from the rollcostsadministrative procedurefiscal equalization

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the appeal against the fiscal equalization decision should remain pending after withdrawal.

Extracted holding

The appeal was struck from the docket because the appellant withdrew it.

Extracted reasoning

Once the appellant communicated the withdrawal, the proceedings were considered exhausted.

Key legal question

Whether court fees and costs should be charged after the withdrawal.

Extracted holding

No fees or costs were levied.

Extracted reasoning

Because the proceedings ended due to withdrawal, the court ordered no taxation of fees or expenses.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.