Appeal withdrawn in building-permit amnesty case

52.1995.59Other CourtApr 20, 1995Withdrawn

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Ticino Administrative Court dealt with an appeal against a State Council decision concerning a building permit in amnesty proceedings. After the appellant’s representative informed the court on 12 April 1995 that the appeal was withdrawn, the court held that the proceedings were terminated. It therefore struck the appeal from the docket and ordered that no fees or costs be charged.

Omnilex headnote

Withdrawal of an administrative appeal renders the proceedings moot and requires striking the case from the docket; in such a situation, the court may dispense with fees and costs where it so orders in the dispositive part.

Full text

AIUTO RICERCA

Anteprima di stampa

Numero d'incarto: 52.1995.59

Data decisione, Autorità: 20.04.1995, TRAM

Incarto n. 52.95.00059 DP 36/95 leo

Lugano 20 aprile 1995

In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

composto dei giudici:

Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna, Stefano Bernasconi

segretario:

Leopoldo Crivelli

statuendo sul ricorso 31 gennaio 1995 di


rappr. da: avv. __________

contro

la decisione 10 gennaio 1995 (n. 29) del Consiglio di Stato in materia di licenza edilizia in sanatoria;

preso atto che in data 12 aprile 1995 il rappresentante del ricorrente ha comunicato di ritirare il ricorso;

considerato pertanto che il procedimento è così esaurito,

decreta:

  1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.

  2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.

  3. Intimazione a:


Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo:

Il presidente: Il segretario:

Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026

  |  Informazioni legali  |  Requisiti minimi  |  Contatta il webmaster

Keywords

withdrawalstrike from rolladministrative appealbuilding permitcostsmootness

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the appeal should be removed from the docket after withdrawal.

Extracted holding

Yes. Once the appellant withdrew the appeal, the proceedings were exhausted and the case had to be struck from the roll.

Extracted reasoning

The court noted the withdrawal communicated on 1995-04-12 and held that this ended the proceedings.

Key legal question

Whether court fees and costs should be charged.

Extracted holding

No. The court ordered that no fees or costs be levied.

Extracted reasoning

Because the proceedings ended through withdrawal, the court dispensed with fees and costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.