Appeal withdrawn and struck from the docket

52.1995.13Other CourtJan 12, 1996Withdrawn

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Ticino Administrative Court dealt with an appeal against a 15 December 1994 decision of the Department of Institutions, Permits and Passports. On 10 January 1996, the appellant's counsel informed the court that the appeal was withdrawn. The court held that the proceedings were thereby exhausted and ordered the appeal struck from the docket. It further decided that no court fees or expenses would be collected.

Omnilex headnote

Administrative appeal withdrawn; proceedings become moot and are struck from the docket. Where the appellant validly withdraws the appeal before judgment, the court no longer enters into the merits and terminates the proceedings. Absent a specific basis to the contrary, no court fees or expenses are levied (cf. consid. 1-2).

Full text

AIUTO RICERCA

Anteprima di stampa

Numero d'incarto: 52.1995.13

Data decisione, Autorità: 12.01.1996, TRAM

Incarto n. 52.95.00013 DP 9/95 leo

Lugano 12 gennaio 1996

In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

composto dei giudici:

Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna, Stefano Bernasconi

segretario:

Leopoldo Crivelli

statuendo sul ricorso 5 gennaio 1995 di


contro

la decisione 15 dicembre 1994 del Dipartimento delle istituzioni, Ufficio permessi e passaporti;

preso atto che in data 10 gennaio 1996 il patrocinatore della ricorrente ha comunicato di ritirare il ricorso;

considerato pertanto che il procedimento è così esaurito;

decreta:

  1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.

  2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.

  3. Intimazione a:


Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

Il presidente Il segretario

Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026

  |  Informazioni legali  |  Requisiti minimi  |  Contatta il webmaster

Keywords

withdrawaladministrative appealmootnesscostsstriking from the docket

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the administrative appeal should be continued after withdrawal

Extracted holding

The appeal was struck from the docket because the withdrawal exhausted the proceedings.

Extracted reasoning

Once the appellant's counsel notified the court of the withdrawal, there was no longer a pending dispute to decide.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.