Withdrawal of appeal in family allowances case

39.2002.17Other CourtMar 28, 2002Withdrawn

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The appellant withdrew the appeal against the family allowance decisions of 10 December 2001. The Ticino Tribunal of Insurance noted the withdrawal, found that the case had become moot, and ordered the matter struck from the docket. It further ordered that no court fees or expenses be charged. The decree was issued by President Daniele Cattaneo.

Omnilex headnote

Withdrawal of appeal; mootness and removal from the docket. When the appellant withdraws the appeal, the court notes the lack of subject matter and strikes the case from the docket; in such circumstances, no court fees or expenses are levied. The procedural order is issued summarily by the court seized of the appeal.

Full text

AIUTO RICERCA

Anteprima di stampa

Numero d'incarto: 39.2002.17

Data decisione, Autorità: 28.03.2002, TCA

RACCOMANDATA

Incarto n. 39.2002.00017-18

dc/fz

Lugano 28 marzo 2002

In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il presidente del Tribunale cantonale delle assicurazioni

Giudice Daniele Cattaneo

visto il ricorso del 7 gennaio 2002 interposto da

__________,

rappr. da: __________,

contro

le decisioni del 10.12.01 emanata da

Cassa cantonale assegni familiari, 6501 Bellinzona

in materia di assegni di famiglia

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

rilevato che in data 21.2.02 è stat assegnato alla parte convenuta il termine di rito per inoltrare la risposta di causa (II);

vista la lettera 21.3.02 del patrocinatore dell'insorgente che dichiara di ritirare il ricorso (VIII);

rilevato che la causa è divenuta priva di oggetto;

viste le disposizioni della Legge di procedura 6.4.1961;

decreta 1. la causa è stralciata dai ruoli:

  1. non si prelevano né tasse né spese;

  2. intimazione alle parti a sensi ed effetti di legge.

Il presidente

del Tribunale cantonale delle assicurazioni

Daniele Cattaneo

Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026

  |  Informazioni legali  |  Requisiti minimi  |  Contatta il webmaster

Keywords

withdrawalmootnessfamily allowancescostsstrike-off

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the appeal should be struck from the docket after withdrawal

Extracted holding

Yes. Since the appellant withdrew the appeal, the case became moot and was removed from the docket.

Extracted reasoning

The court noted the withdrawal letter, held that the case had become devoid of subject matter, and ordered removal from the docket.

Key legal question

Whether court fees and costs should be charged

Extracted holding

No fees or costs were levied.

Extracted reasoning

Given the withdrawal and termination of the proceedings, the court ordered that no taxes or expenses be collected.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.