39.2001.81•Appeal struck off as moot in family allowance case
39.2001.81Other CourtJan 7, 2002Dismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
The appellant had challenged a decision of the Canton Family Allowances Fund, but later clarified that the filing sent to the court was not meant as an appeal, only as a request for help and advice because of his difficult financial situation. The Cantonal Insurance Court therefore found that the case lacked предмет and ordered it struck from the docket. It also decided that no court fees or expenses would be collected.
Mootness; where the purported appeal is expressly clarified by the filing party as not being a legal remedy but merely a request for assistance, no justiciable dispute remains and the proceedings must be struck off the rolls. In such a situation, the court may likewise waive the levy of court fees and expenses pursuant to the applicable procedural law.
AIUTO RICERCA
Anteprima di stampa
Numero d'incarto: 39.2001.81
Data decisione, Autorità: 07.01.2002, TCA
RACCOMANDATA
Incarto n. 39.2001.00081
fz
Lugano 7 gennaio 2002
In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino
Il presidente del Tribunale cantonale delle assicurazioni
Giudice Daniele Cattaneo
visto il ricorso del 11 dicembre 2001 interposto da
__________,
contro
la decisione del 23.2.01 emanata da
Cassa cantonale assegni familiari, 6501 Bellinzona
in materia di assegni di famiglia
letti ed esaminati gli atti;
vista la lettera 4.1.02 dell'insorgente che dichiara che il suo scritto 11.12.01 al Tribunale non è da ritenere ricorso ma trattasi di "una richiesta di aiuto e consulenza vista la sua difficile situazione economica";
rilevato che la causa è priva di oggetto;
viste le disposizioni della Legge di procedura 6.4.1961;
decreta 1. la causa è stralciata dai ruoli:
non si prelevano né tasse né spese;
intimazione alle parti a sensi ed effetti di legge.
Il presidente
del Tribunale cantonale delle assicurazioni
Daniele Cattaneo
Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026
| Informazioni legali | Requisiti minimi | Contatta il webmaster
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the filing of 2001-12-11 should be treated as an appeal against the decision of 2001-02-23.
The court accepted the appellant's clarification that the filing was not an appeal but a request for help and advice.
Because the author expressly stated that the writing was not intended as a legal remedy, there was no live appeal to decide.
How to dispose of the proceedings in light of the absence of a pending dispute.
The case had to be struck off the rolls.
Once it was clear that no appeal was pending, the proceedings were devoid of subject matter.
Allocation of costs and court fees.
No court fees or costs were charged.
The decree expressly waived both taxes and expenses.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.