Appeal struck out after withdrawal

39.2001.54Other CourtMar 25, 2002Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The appellant challenged a decision of the Cantonal Family Allowances Fund before the Ticino Insurance Court. During the proceedings, the appellant withdrew the appeal by letter of 14 March 2002. The president held that the case had become devoid of object, struck it from the docket, and ordered that no fees or costs be charged. The parties were to be notified according to law.

Omnilex headnote

Withdrawal of the appeal; mootness of the proceedings; striking out of the case. Where the appellant expressly withdraws the appeal, the court notes the absence of a live controversy and removes the matter from the docket. In such circumstances, and absent contrary indications, no court fees or expenses are levied (consid. 1-2).

Full text

AIUTO RICERCA

Anteprima di stampa

Numero d'incarto: 39.2001.54

Data decisione, Autorità: 25.03.2002, TCA

RACCOMANDATA

Incarto n. 39.2001.00054

dc/fz

Lugano 25 marzo 2002

In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il presidente del Tribunale cantonale delle assicurazioni

Giudice Daniele Cattaneo

visto il ricorso del 24 agosto 2001 di

__________,

contro

la decisoni 24.07.01 della

Cassa cantonale assegni familiari, 6501 Bellinzona

in materia di assegni di famiglia

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

richiamata l'ordinanza 28.8.01 con la quale il Tribunale ha assegnato alla parte convenuta il termine di rito per presentare la risposta (II);

vista la lettera 14.03.02 della parte ricorrente che comunica il ritiro del ricorso (XI);

rilevato che la causa è divenuta priva di oggetto;

viste le disposizioni della Legge di procedura 6.4.61;

decreta 1. la causa è stralciata dai ruoli;

  1. non si percepiscono né tasse né spese;

intimazione alle parti a sensi ed effetti di legge.

Il presidente

del Tribunale cantonale delle assicurazioni

Daniele Cattaneo

Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026

  |  Informazioni legali  |  Requisiti minimi  |  Contatta il webmaster

Keywords

family allowanceswithdrawal of appealmootnessstruck outcourt costs

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the appeal should be dismissed from the docket after withdrawal.

Extracted holding

The case became moot after the appeal was withdrawn and was struck from the docket.

Extracted reasoning

The appellant’s letter of 14 March 2002 expressly withdrew the appeal; therefore the proceeding had no remaining object.

Key legal question

Whether court fees and costs should be charged.

Extracted holding

No court fees or costs were levied.

Extracted reasoning

After the withdrawal and resulting mootness, the court ordered that no fees or expenses be collected.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.