Appeal withdrawn; case struck from the roll

33.2002.51Other CourtSep 10, 2002Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The appellant challenged a 25 July 2002 decision of the Cantonal Compensation Fund concerning supplementary benefits. After the court had set a deadline for the respondent's answer, the appellant notified the court by letter of 26 August 2002 that the appeal was withdrawn. The Tribunal cantonale delle assicurazioni therefore held that the case had become devoid of object, struck it from the roll, and ordered that no fees or costs be levied.

Omnilex headnote

Withdrawal of the appeal; mootness of the proceedings; striking out from the roll and no costs. Where the appellant withdraws the appeal, the dispute loses its object and the court may discontinue the proceeding without a merits review. In such a situation, and absent special circumstances, no court fees or expenses are charged (consid. 1-2).

Full text

AIUTO RICERCA

Anteprima di stampa

Numero d'incarto: 33.2002.51

Data decisione, Autorità: 10.09.2002, TCA

RACCOMANDATA

Incarto n. 33.2002.00051

ir/gm

Lugano 10 settembre 2002

In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il giudice delegato del Tribunale cantonale delle assicurazioni

Giudice Ivano Ranzanici

visto il ricorso del 9 agosto 2002 interposto da


contro

la decisione del 25 luglio 2002 emanata dalla

Cassa cant. di compensazione, 6501 Bellinzona 1 Caselle,

in materia di prestazioni complementari

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

richiamata l'ordinanza 19 agosto 2002 con la quale il Tribunale ha assegnato alla parte convenuta il termine di rito per presentare la risposta;

vista la lettera 26 agosto 2002 della parte ricorrente che comunica il ritiro del ricorso;

rilevato che la causa è divenuta priva di oggetto;

viste le disposizioni della Legge di procedura 6.4.61;

decreta 1. la causa è stralciata dai ruoli;

  1. non si percepiscono né tasse né spese;

intimazione alle parti a sensi ed effetti di legge.

Il giudice delegato

del Tribunale cantonale delle assicurazioni

Ivano Ranzanici

Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026

  |  Informazioni legali  |  Requisiti minimi  |  Contatta il webmaster

Keywords

withdrawalmootnesssupplementary benefitsstriking outcourt costs

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the withdrawn appeal should still be examined on the merits

Extracted holding

The proceeding became moot after the appeal was withdrawn, so it was not examined on the merits.

Extracted reasoning

The appellant's letter of 2002-08-26 stated that the appeal was withdrawn; consequently the case had become devoid of object.

Key legal question

How the withdrawn appeal should be disposed of procedurally

Extracted holding

The case was struck from the roll.

Extracted reasoning

Since the dispute no longer had an object, the court ordered removal from the docket.

Key legal question

Court fees and costs

Extracted holding

No court fees or costs were charged.

Extracted reasoning

Given the procedural termination after withdrawal, the court ordered that neither taxes nor expenses be levied.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.