Appeal withdrawn; case struck from the docket

33.2002.36Other CourtJul 4, 2002Withdrawn

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The appellant appealed two decisions of the cantonal compensation fund concerning supplementary benefits. Before the court ruled on the merits, the appellant’s representative informed the Tribunal cantonale delle assicurazioni on 1 July 2002 that the appeal was withdrawn. The judge held that the matter had become moot and ordered the case struck from the docket. No court fees or expenses were levied, and notice was given to the parties.

Omnilex headnote

Withdrawal of appeal; mootness; striking off the cause: when the appellant withdraws the appeal before judgment, the proceedings become devoid of object and must be removed from the docket. In such circumstances, and absent special reasons, no court fees or costs are levied (consid. 1-2).

Full text

AIUTO RICERCA

Anteprima di stampa

Numero d'incarto: 33.2002.36

Data decisione, Autorità: 04.07.2002, TCA

RACCOMANDATA

Incarto n. 33.2002.00036

ir/gm

Lugano 4 luglio 2002

In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il giudice delegato del Tribunale cantonale delle assicurazioni

Giudice Ivano Ranzanici

visto il ricorso del 24 giugno 2002 interposto da

__________,

rappr. da: __________

contro

le decisioni del 13 giugno 2002 emanate dalla

Cassa cant. di compensazione, 6501 Bellinzona 1 Caselle,

in materia di prestazioni complementari

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

vista la lettera 1 luglio 2002 della signora __________, procuratrice della ricorrente, che comunica il ritiro del ricorso (cfr. Doc. _);

rilevato che la causa è divenuta priva di oggetto;

viste le disposizioni della Legge di procedura 6.4.61;

decreta 1. la causa è stralciata dai ruoli;

  1. non si percepiscono né tasse né spese;

intimazione alle parti a sensi ed effetti di legge.

Il giudice delegato

del Tribunale cantonale delle assicurazioni

Ivano Ranzanici

Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026

  |  Informazioni legali  |  Requisiti minimi  |  Contatta il webmaster

Keywords

supplementary benefitswithdrawal of appealmootnessstriking offcourt costs

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the appeal should be struck off after withdrawal.

Extracted holding

The appeal became moot after the appellant withdrew it, so the case was struck from the docket.

Extracted reasoning

The withdrawal letter meant there was no longer a live dispute.

Key legal question

Whether court fees or costs should be charged.

Extracted holding

No fees or costs were charged.

Extracted reasoning

Given the withdrawal and removal from the docket, the court ordered no taxation of fees or expenses.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.