Appeal struck off after withdrawal

33.2001.42Other CourtMay 31, 2001Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The insured person appealed a 6 April 2001 decision of the cantonal compensation fund concerning complementary benefits. Before the respondent filed its answer, the appellant withdrew the appeal by letter of 18 May 2001. The single judge of the Ticino Social Insurance Court held that the case had become moot, struck it from the docket, and ordered that no court fees or costs be levied.

Omnilex headnote

Withdrawal of the appeal renders the proceedings moot; the court strikes the case from the docket and, absent contrary grounds, orders no court fees or expenses. The decision is rendered by way of procedural decree once the appellant has expressly withdrawn the remedy (consid. implicit).

Full text

AIUTO RICERCA

Anteprima di stampa

Numero d'incarto: 33.2001.42

Data decisione, Autorità: 31.05.2001, TCA

RACCOMANDATA

Incarto n. 33.2001.00042

ir/fz

Lugano 31 maggio 2001

In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il giudice delegato del Tribunale cantonale delle assicurazioni

Giudice Ivano Ranzanici

visto il ricorso del 26 aprile 2001 di


contro

la decisione 6 aprile 2001 della

Cassa cant. di compensazione, 6501 Bellinzona

in materia di prestazioni complementari

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

richiamata l'ordinanza 30.4.01 con la quale il Tribunale ha assegnato alla parte convenuta il termine di rito per presentare la risposta;

vista la lettera 18 maggio 2001 della parte ricorrente che comunica il ritiro del ricorso;

rilevato che la causa è divenuta priva di oggetto;

viste le disposizioni della Legge di procedura 6.4.61;

decreta 1. la causa è stralciata dai ruoli;

  1. non si percepiscono né tasse né spese;

intimazione alle parti a sensi ed effetti di legge.

Il giudice delegato

del Tribunale cantonale delle assicurazioni

Ivano Ranzanici

Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026

  |  Informazioni legali  |  Requisiti minimi  |  Contatta il webmaster

Keywords

withdrawalmootnessstrike offcourt costscomplementary benefits

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the appeal should continue after the appellant withdrew it.

Extracted holding

The proceedings were terminated because the appeal had been withdrawn and the case had become moot.

Extracted reasoning

The court noted the withdrawal letter of 18 May 2001 and held that the matter no longer had a subject matter.

Key legal question

Whether court fees and costs should be charged.

Extracted holding

No court fees or costs were imposed.

Extracted reasoning

Because the matter was removed from the docket after withdrawal, the court ordered that no taxes or expenses be collected.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.