Complaint withdrawn in debt enforcement supervision

15.1996.00044Other CourtJun 18, 1996Withdrawn

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The complainant filed a supervisory complaint against the Lugano enforcement office in two enforcement proceedings. After the court had granted suspensive effect by presidential decree, the complainant withdrew the complaint in writing on 14 June 1996. The Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti of the Ticino Court of Appeal held that the matter had become moot and ordered the complaint struck from the docket. It also decided that no costs would be charged and no compensation would be granted.

Omnilex headnote

Art. 67 cpv. 2 and Art. 68 cpv. 2 OTLEF; withdrawal of a supervisory complaint in debt enforcement proceedings renders the matter devoid of object and leads to striking it from the docket. In such a case, the court may order no costs and no indemnities, depending on the circumstances and the procedural posture, when the appeal is no longer adjudicated on the merits (consid. implicit).

Full text

AIUTO RICERCA

Anteprima di stampa

Numero d'incarto: 15.1996.00044

Data decisione, Autorità: 18.06.1996, CEF

Incarto n. 15.96.00044

Lugano 18 giugno 1996/C/fc/fb

In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

La Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d'appello quale autorità di vigilanza

composta dei giudici:

Cometta, presidente, Pellegrini e Zali

segretario:

Baur Martinelli, vicecancelliera

visto il reclamo 25 marzo 1996 di


contro

l’operato dell’Ufficio di esecuzione di Lugano nelle esecuzioni n. __________ e __________ promosse contro


richiamato il decreto presidenziale 26 marzo 1996 di concessione dell’effetto sospensivo;

preso atto che il reclamante con scritto 14 giugno 1996 ha ritirato il reclamo;

considerato come il gravame sia divenuto così privo d’oggetto;

richiamati gli art. 67 cpv. 2 e 68 cpv. 2 OTLEF

DECRETA:

  1. Il reclamo 25 marzo 1996 dell’__________, è stralciato dai ruoli per intervenuto ritiro.

  2. Non si prelevano spese e non si assegnano indennità.

  3. Intimazione a: _____________

Per la Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello

quale autorità di vigilanza

Il presidente La segretaria

Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026

  |  Informazioni legali  |  Requisiti minimi  |  Contatta il webmaster

Keywords

debt enforcementsupervisory complaintwithdrawalmootnesscostssuspensive effect

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the supervisory complaint should be removed from the docket after withdrawal.

Extracted holding

Yes. Because the complainant withdrew the complaint, the matter became moot and was struck from the docket.

Extracted reasoning

The court noted the written withdrawal of 14 June 1996 and considered the appeal deprived of object, warranting removal from the docket.

Key legal question

Whether costs or compensation should be awarded.

Extracted holding

No costs were charged and no compensation was awarded.

Extracted reasoning

The decree expressly provided that no court costs would be collected and no indemnities would be granted.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.