Withdrawal of objection; severance and costs in penalty-order opposition

10.2003.431Other CourtNov 3, 2003Other

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

Two women had filed objections to two penalty decrees. Before the hearing, defense counsel withdrew one objection. The Pretura penale in Bellinzona struck that criminal file from the roll and declared the corresponding decree enforceable. For the other accused, the court ordered the matter to proceed separately and stated that the already-postponed public hearing would take place. Court fees of CHF 50 and judicial costs were charged to the first named woman.

Omnilex headnote

Art. 210-211 CPP; effect of withdrawal of an objection to a penalty decree and procedural severance: where the objection is withdrawn, the court strikes the matter from the roll and the penalty decree acquires enforceability. If objections concern multiple accused, the court may order separate proceedings for the remaining accused. Costs of the order may be charged to the party against whom the procedural consequence is directed.

Full text

AIUTO RICERCA

Anteprima di stampa

Numero d'incarto: 10.2003.431

Data decisione, Autorità: 03.11.2003, PRPEN

Incarto n. 10.2003.431 10.2003.432

DA 2010/2003 DA 2011/2003

Bellinzona 3 novembre 2003

Stralcio In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il Giudice della Pretura penale

Damiano Stefani

Richiamate le opposizioni 25 giugno 2003 di

__________ __________, di __________ e di __________ nata __________, nata il __________ __________ __________ a __________ (Bosnia), cittadina bosniaca, domiciliata a __________, coniugata, __________,

e

__________ __________, nata __________, fu __________ e di __________ nata __________, nata il __________ __________ __________ a __________ (Bosnia), cittadina jugoslava, domiciliata a __________, coniugata, __________, entrambe difese da: avv. __________ __________, __________,

interposte ai decreti d'accusa n. DA / e n. DA / di data __________ __________ 2003 del Procuratore pubblico Moreno Capella, __________;

preso atto del ritiro dell'opposizione al decreto n. DA / emesso nei confronti di __________ __________ con lettera __________ __________ 2003 del difensore;

visti gli art. 210 e 211 CPP,

decreta: 1. Il procedimento penale nei confronti di __________ __________ è stralciato dai ruoli ed il decreto d'accusa n. DA / diventa esecutivo.

§ L'incarto ..__________sarà ritornato al Procuratore pubblico Moreno Capella, __________, per quanto di sua competenza.

2.Nei confronti di __________ __________, nata __________, si procederà separatamente ed il pubblico dibattimento, già aggiornato avrà quindi luogo.

  1. La tassa di giustizia di fr. 50.00 e le spese relative alla presente decisione sono a carico della signora __________ __________.

  2. Intimazione a:

__________ __________, __________ __________ __________, __________, __________ __________, __________ ____________________, __________, Procuratore pubblico Moreno Capella, __________, __________, __________ __________ __________ __________, __________ __________ __________, __________, Avv. __________ __________, __________, __________, Avv. __________ __________, __________, __________.

Il giudice: Il segretario:

Distinta spese: Tassa di giustizia fr. 50.00

Spese giudiziarie fr. 30.00

Totale fr. 80.00

Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026

  |  Informazioni legali  |  Requisiti minimi  |  Contatta il webmaster

Keywords

objection withdrawalpenalty decreeseverancecostsenforceability

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

What is the effect of the withdrawal of the objection to one penalty decree?

Extracted holding

The criminal proceedings against that accused are removed from the docket and the penalty decree becomes enforceable.

Extracted reasoning

Once the objection was withdrawn, the court noted the withdrawal and applied the procedural consequence of striking the case from the roll, allowing the decree to take effect.

Key legal question

How should the proceedings be handled for the co-accused whose objection remained pending?

Extracted holding

The proceedings are to continue separately, and the already-postponed public hearing will take place.

Extracted reasoning

Because only one objection was withdrawn, the court ordered a separate procedural track for the remaining accused.

Key legal question

Who bears the court fee and costs of this order?

Extracted holding

The fee and the costs of this decision are charged to the first named woman.

Extracted reasoning

The court expressly allocated the justice fee and judicial costs to that party in the dispositive part.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.