10.2002.86•Case struck after withdrawal of complaint
10.2002.86Other CourtNov 20, 2003Dismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
The Pretura penale, after an objection to a summary penal decree, noted that the complainant withdrew the complaint at the hearing. On that basis, Judge Marco Ambrosini ordered the criminal proceeding struck off the docket and sent the file back to the public prosecutor for the matters within his competence. The court further ordered that taxes and costs be borne by the State.
Art. 31 cpv. 1 and 123 n. 1 CP; withdrawal of the complaint during the hearing leads to discontinuance of the criminal proceeding and removal from the docket. Once the private complaint is withdrawn, the court may no longer pursue the matter on the merits; the file is returned to the prosecution authority for any residual competence. Procedural costs may be charged to the State where the proceeding is terminated on that basis (consid. unspecified).
AIUTO RICERCA
Anteprima di stampa
Numero d'incarto: 10.2002.86
Data decisione, Autorità: 20.11.2003, PRPEN
Incarto n. 10.2002.86/AMM DAP 1685/2002
Bellinzona 20 novembre 2003
Stralcio In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino
Il Giudice della Pretura penale
Marco Ambrosini
richiamata l'opposizione del 29 luglio 2002 di
__________ __________, di __________ e __________ n. __________, nato a __________ il __________ __________ 1968, attinente di __________, domiciliato a __________, via __________ __________, celibe, pittore (difeso dall'avv. __________ __________, __________)
interposta al decreto d’accusa DAP / di data __________ 2002 del Procuratore pubblico Arturo Garzoni, __________,
preso atto del ritiro della querela con dichiarazione di __________ __________ resa durante il dibattimento odierno;
visti gli art. 31 cpv. 1 e 123 n. 1 CP,
decreta: 1. Il procedimento è stralciato dai ruoli.
L'incarto è ritornato al Procuratore pubblico Arturo Garzoni, __________, per quanto di sua competenza.
Le tasse e le spese sono a carico dello Stato.
Intimazione a:
__________ __________, __________, avv. __________ __________, __________, Procuratore pubblico Arturo Garzoni, __________, __________ __________, per il tramite dell'avv. __________ __________, avv. __________ __________, __________.
Il giudice: La segretaria:
Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026
| Informazioni legali | Requisiti minimi | Contatta il webmaster
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the criminal proceedings had to be discontinued after withdrawal of the complaint.
Yes. In view of the withdrawal of the complaint, the case was removed from the docket and the files were returned to the prosecutor.
The court noted the withdrawal of the complaint made during the hearing and, relying on the cited Criminal Code provisions, ordered the proceeding struck off.
How the procedural costs should be allocated after discontinuance.
The costs and fees were borne by the State.
Because the proceeding was terminated following the withdrawal, the court assigned the expenses to the public treasury.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.