Proceedings struck after withdrawal of opposition

10.2002.117Other CourtNov 13, 2003Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The defendant had lodged an opposition to a criminal decree issued by the public prosecutor, but withdrew it during the hearing before the Pretura penale in Bellinzona. The single judge, Marco Ambrosini, therefore ordered the proceedings struck from the roll and declared the decree enforceable. The court also decided that no fees or costs would be charged for this judgment.

Omnilex headnote

Art. 210–211 CPP; withdrawal of opposition against a criminal decree: if the opponent withdraws the opposition at the hearing, the court removes the case from the roll and the decree of accusation becomes enforceable. The procedural termination follows directly from the withdrawal; no substantive adjudication on the merits is required. In the absence of a merits decision, the court may order that no court fees or expenses be charged (consid. implicit).

Full text

AIUTO RICERCA

Anteprima di stampa

Numero d'incarto: 10.2002.117

Data decisione, Autorità: 13.11.2003, PRPEN

Incarto n. 10.2002.117/AMM DAP 753/2002

Bellinzona 13 novembre 2003

Stralcio In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il Giudice della Pretura penale

Marco Ambrosini

richiamata l'opposizione del 15 aprile 2002 di

__________ __________, fu __________ e di __________ n. __________, nata a __________ __________ il __________ 1962, attinente di __________, domiciliata a __________, contrada __________ __________ __________, nubile, impiegata d'ufficio (difesa dal lic. iur. __________ __________ __________, __________)

interposta al decreto d’accusa DAP / di data __________ 2002 del Procuratore pubblico Rosa Item, __________;

preso atto del ritiro della suddetta opposizione con dichiarazione resa durante il dibattimento odierno;

visti gli art. 210 e 211 CPP,

decreta: 1. Il procedimento è stralciato dai ruoli e il decreto d'accusa è esecutivo.

L'incarto è ritornato al Procuratore pubblico Rosa Item, __________, per quanto di sua competenza.

  1. Non si prelevano né tasse né spese dell'attuale giudizio.

  2. Intimazione a:

– __________ __________, __________, – lic. iur. __________ __________ __________, studio legale __________ & __________, __________, – Procuratore pubblico Rosa Item, __________, – __________ e __________ __________, __________.

Il giudice: La segretaria:

Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026

  |  Informazioni legali  |  Requisiti minimi  |  Contatta il webmaster

Keywords

criminal decreeopposition withdrawalprocedural terminationenforceabilitycourt costs

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the opposition to the criminal decree should be maintained or the proceedings struck after withdrawal.

Extracted holding

Because the opposition was withdrawn during the hearing, the proceedings were struck and the criminal decree became enforceable.

Extracted reasoning

The court took note of the withdrawal of the opposition and, under Arts. 210 and 211 CPP, ordered the case removed from the roll with the decree of accusation becoming final.

Key legal question

How costs of the present judgment should be allocated.

Extracted holding

No court fees or costs were charged.

Extracted reasoning

Given the procedural termination following withdrawal, the court ordered that no taxes or expenses be levied.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.