ATA/92/1997•Revision of erroneous factual finding in housing surcharge case
ATA/92/1997Court of Justice / Administrative ChamberFeb 4, 1997Granted
Extracted by Omnilex
In a revision proceeding concerning a social-housing surcharge, the TA held that its earlier judgment contained an erroneous factual finding. Because the error constituted an inadvertence, revision was granted. The court also stated that the OCP file is a relevant means of proving that a person has left the canton. No further procedural details are available from the excerpt.
LGL. 31; révision pour inadvertance résultant d'une constatation de fait erronée; un arrêt fondé sur un fait matériellement inexact peut être révisé lorsque l'erreur procède d'une inadvertance manifeste. Le dossier de l'OCP constitue un moyen de preuve pertinent pour établir le départ d'une personne du canton (consid. non indiqué).
Descripteurs
PROCEDURE ADMINISTRATIVE; REVISION(DECISION); LOGEMENT; SURTAXE; LOGEMENT SOCIAL; DOMICILE; PROC
Normes
LGL.31
Résumé
L'arrêt du TA qui constate un fait erroné est entaché d'une inadvertance et doit être révisé. Le fichier de l'OCP est un moyen pertinent pour attester du départ d'une personne du canton.
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the prior TA judgment had to be revised because it contained an erroneous factual finding.
Yes. The incorrect factual finding amounted to an inadvertence justifying revision.
A judgment based on a materially mistaken fact may be revised when the mistake is established as an inadvertence.
Whether the OCP file could serve as relevant evidence of a person's departure from the canton.
Yes. The OCP file was considered a relevant means of proof for that fact.
The court accepted the OCP file as probative evidence of departure from the canton.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.