projects

No revision grounds based on cited Federal judgment

ATA/76/1996Court of Justice / Administrative ChamberFeb 6, 1996Dismissed

Open source

Summary

The applicant sought revision in administrative proceedings, relying on a Federal Supreme Court judgment. The court held that this reference did not establish a revision ground under Art. 48 LPA and therefore rejected the request.

Regest

Art. 48 LPA; revision in administrative proceedings requires a statutory ground specifically recognized by law. The mere invocation of an ATF, without showing that the judgment reveals a relevant revision fact or legal basis within the meaning of the revision provisions, is insufficient. Revision is inadmissible where the applicant only reargues the case or relies abstractly on case law without satisfying the cumulative conditions for extraordinary review.

Full text

Descripteurs

REVISION(DECISION); PROCEDURE ADMINISTRATIVE; PROC

Normes

LPA.48

Résumé

Pas de motif de revision en l'espèce (invocation d'un ATF).

Keywords

revisionadministrative procedurestatutory groundsfederal judgmentextraordinary review