Key legal question
Whether double affiliation is prohibited in a transition from collective to individual mandatory health insurance.
ATA/526/1996•Double affiliation in mandatory health insurance
ATA/526/1996Court of Justice / Administrative ChamberSep 24, 1996
Extracted by Omnilex
The case concerns mandatory social health insurance and the prohibition of double affiliation in a situation where an insured person moves from collective coverage to an individual policy. The available information only indicates the legal question; no details on the parties, procedural history, or operative part are provided.
LAMal Art. 11; prohibition of double affiliation in mandatory health insurance when changing from collective to individual coverage; the decisive point is whether the new individual affiliation can coexist with an existing collective affiliation or whether the earlier affiliation must be terminated before, or at the latest upon, the effective start of the new coverage. The determination turns on the continuity of compulsory coverage and the avoidance of overlapping memberships.
Descripteurs
ASSURANCE SOCIALE; AM; ASSURANCE OBLIGATOIRE; ASSU
Normes
LAMO.11
Résumé
Interdiction de la double affiliation; situation dans un cas de passage d'une assurance collective à une assurance individuelle.
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether double affiliation is prohibited in a transition from collective to individual mandatory health insurance.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.