Double affiliation in mandatory health insurance

ATA/526/1996Court of Justice / Administrative ChamberSep 24, 1996

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The case concerns mandatory social health insurance and the prohibition of double affiliation in a situation where an insured person moves from collective coverage to an individual policy. The available information only indicates the legal question; no details on the parties, procedural history, or operative part are provided.

Omnilex headnote

LAMal Art. 11; prohibition of double affiliation in mandatory health insurance when changing from collective to individual coverage; the decisive point is whether the new individual affiliation can coexist with an existing collective affiliation or whether the earlier affiliation must be terminated before, or at the latest upon, the effective start of the new coverage. The determination turns on the continuity of compulsory coverage and the avoidance of overlapping memberships.

Full text

Descripteurs

ASSURANCE SOCIALE; AM; ASSURANCE OBLIGATOIRE; ASSU

Normes

LAMO.11

Résumé

Interdiction de la double affiliation; situation dans un cas de passage d'une assurance collective à une assurance individuelle.

Keywords

social insurancemandatory health insurancedouble affiliationcollective insuranceindividual insurance

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether double affiliation is prohibited in a transition from collective to individual mandatory health insurance.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.