Key legal question
Whether the new traffic offence committed on 1997-03-20 after a prior withdrawal ending on 1995-03-20 constituted recidivism under Art. 17(1)(c) LCR.
Extracted holding
Yes. The prior withdrawal had not yet fallen outside the relevant recidivism period, so the case required a mandatory withdrawal of at least six months.
Extracted reasoning
The court treated the interval between the end of the previous withdrawal and the new offence as falling within the statutory recidivism framework of Art. 17(1)(c) LCR, which triggers an obligatory minimum withdrawal.