Son’s income included in determining housing income

ATA/373/1996Court of Justice / Administrative ChamberJun 25, 1996Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The case concerned a housing-social surcharge calculation. The appellant argued that her own income alone should be taken into account. The court held that, under Art. 31(1) LGL, the income of the appellant’s son had to be added to hers for purposes of determining the relevant income. The appeal was therefore dismissed.

Omnilex headnote

Art. 31 al. 1 LGL; détermination du revenu déterminant en matière de logement social: le revenu à prendre en considération peut comprendre celui des membres du ménage, en particulier celui d’un enfant vivant dans le foyer, lorsque la norme applicable commande une appréciation globale de la capacité économique du ménage. Le cumul de revenus s’impose pour fixer le revenu déterminant servant au calcul de la surtaxe; l’autorité n’a pas à s’écarter de cette méthode en l’absence d’élément particulier excluant la prise en compte du revenu familial (consid. non indiqués).

Full text

Descripteurs

LOGEMENT; SURTAXE; LOGEMENT SOCIAL; REVENU DETERMINANT; IEA

Normes

LGL.31 al.1

Résumé

Pour calculer le revenu déterminant, le revenu du fils de la recourante doit être cumulé avec celui de celle-ci.

Keywords

housingsurchargesocial housingdeterminative incomehousehold income

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the son’s income must be included in the appellant’s determinative income for housing-social surcharge purposes.

Extracted holding

Yes. The son’s income had to be cumulated with the appellant’s income when calculating the determinative income.

Extracted reasoning

The court applied Art. 31(1) LGL and held that, for the relevant income calculation, the son’s earnings were attributable to the household determination used for the surcharge.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.