Exclusion of instructor candidates does not violate trade freedom

ATA/326/1996Court of Justice / Administrative ChamberMay 29, 1996Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The court held that professional driving schools may exclude instructor candidates who do not have the required qualifications. This does not violate freedom of trade and industry, because the provision is limited to qualification control and does not impose an impermissible restriction on economic activity.

Omnilex headnote

OAC 51 al. 3; freedom of trade and industry: a provision allowing professional schools to exclude instructor candidates who lack the required qualifications is not contrary to economic freedom. The measure is a permissible qualification-related control and does not constitute an unlawful hindrance of access to the profession.

Full text

Descripteurs

CIRCULATION ROUTIERE; MONITEUR DE CONDUITE; LIBERTE DU COMMERCE ET DE L'INDUSTRIE; LCR

Normes

OAC.51 al.3

Résumé

La possibilité donnée aux écoles professionnelles d'exclure les candidats instructeurs qui n'ont pas les qualités requises ne viole pas la liberté du commerce et de l'industrie.

Keywords

road trafficdriving instructortrade freedomeconomic freedomqualification requirements

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether OAC 51 para. 3, allowing professional schools to exclude instructor candidates lacking the required qualifications, violates freedom of trade and industry.

Extracted holding

No. The rule is compatible with freedom of trade and industry because it permits schools to refuse unsuitable candidates without unlawfully restricting economic activity.

Extracted reasoning

The challenged provision concerns qualification control for driving instructors and does not amount to an impermissible interference with economic freedom.

Exclusion of instructor candidates does not violate trade freedomAI generated