projects
ATA/316/1996 ΓÇó Cessation of daily allowances under accident insurance
ATA/316/1996Court of Justice / Administrative ChamberMay 29, 1996Dismissed
The appellant in an accident-insurance dispute failed to show that moving from a 50% to a 100% workload would be an insurmountable effort. The court therefore rejected the appeal and confirmed the cessation of daily allowance benefits under Art. 16(1) LAA.
Art. 16 al. 1 LAA; cessation of daily allowances after improvement of work capacity. A claimant who disputes the termination of daily benefits must demonstrate, with substantiated arguments, that the increase in work capacity cannot reasonably be expected because it would constitute an insurmountable effort. Mere assertion of difficulty is insufficient; absent such proof, the insurer’s cessation of daily allowances is upheld.
Descripteurs
ASSURANCE SOCIALE; ACCIDENT; AA; DOULEUR DE LA TETE; INDEMNITE JOURNALIERE; ASSU
Normes
LAA.16 al.1
Résumé
Le recourant ne démontre pas que l'augementation de son temps de travail de 50 à 100 % représenterait un effort insurmontable. Rejet du recours, confirmtion de la cessation du versement des indemnités journalières.