LPP claim accepted due to defendant’s passivity

ATA/228/1995Court of Justice / Administrative ChamberApr 28, 1995Granted

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The case concerns an LPP claim. The defendant remained passive and did not collaborate in the proceedings. On that basis, the court accepted the claim.

Omnilex headnote

LPA 22; duty to collaborate and consequences of a party’s passivity in evidentiary proceedings. Where a party fails to cooperate and thereby impedes clarification of the facts, the court may decide on the basis of the available record and draw adverse procedural consequences from the lack of collaboration, provided the evidentiary situation permits it.

Full text

Descripteurs

ASSURANCE SOCIALE; DEVOIR DE COLLABORER; COLLABORATION(EN GENERAL); CONSTATATION DES FAITS

Normes

LPA.22

Résumé

Demande LPP. Passivité du défendeur. Acceptation de la demande.

Keywords

social insuranceduty to cooperatecollaborationfactsLPP claim

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Whether the LPP claim should be granted despite the defendant’s passivity and lack of cooperation.

The claim was accepted.

The summary indicates that the defendant remained passive; in this context, the court granted the claim, relying on the duty to cooperate and the factual findings available.