ATA/145/1995•No actuarial expert report without concrete objections to premium increase
ATA/145/1995Court of Justice / Administrative ChamberMar 21, 1995Dismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
The administrative court refused to order an actuarial expert report against a social insurance fund's premium increase. It held that, without concrete and specific objections to the increase, there was no basis for further evidence. The request was therefore rejected and the challenge failed.
LAMA.12; expertise actuarielle en matière de primes d'assurance sociale: une expertise n'est ordonnée que si la partie requérante soulève des griefs concrets et étayés contre la hausse de cotisations. De simples critiques générales ou non motivées ne suffisent pas à justifier une instruction probatoire complémentaire (consid. non précisé).
Descripteurs
ASSURANCE SOCIALE; PRIME D'ASSURANCE; AUGMENTATION(EN GENERAL); MOTIVATION; EXPERTISE
Normes
LAMA.12
Résumé
Le TA n'ordonne pas une expertise actuarielle de la caisse en l'absence de griefs concrets à l'encontre d'une hausse de cotisations.
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether an actuarial expert report must be ordered to challenge the fund's premium increase.
No. In the absence of concrete grievances against the increase, the court does not order an actuarial expertise.
A mere general objection to the premium increase is insufficient; the request for expert evidence requires specific, substantiated criticisms of the fund's calculation or basis for the increase.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.