Appeal against removal-enforcement order partially upheld

d-6082-2006Federal Administrative Court / Division 4Nov 23, 2007Partially Granted

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

Z.________, represented by Dr. Stephane Laederich, appealed a BFM decision of 23 August 2006 concerning enforcement of removal. The Federal Administrative Court granted the appeal, annulled items 4 and 5 of the BFM decision, and remitted the case for reconsideration. No court costs were imposed. The BFM was ordered to pay the appellant CHF 400 in party compensation.

Omnilex headnote

Appeal against a removal-enforcement decision; partial annulment and remittal. Where the record does not permit confirmation of the enforcement measures, the appellate court may set aside the contested operative clauses and return the matter to the authority for fresh assessment. If the appeal succeeds, court costs are not imposed on the appellant and party compensation may be awarded.

Full text

BVGer D-6082/2006

Entscheiddatum: 23.11.2007Publikationsdatum: 11.12.2007

Tribunal administrativ federal

Abteilung IV

D-6082/2006/

sch/zue

{T 0/2}

Urteil vom 23. November 2007

Besetzung

Richter Hans Schürch, Richterin Therese Kojic, Richter Bendicht Tellenbach,

Gerichtsschreiberin Eva Zürcher.

Parteien

Z._______, geboren _______, Serbien (Kosovo)

vertreten durch Dr. Stephane Laederich, _______,

Beschwerdeführerin,

gegen

Bundesamt für Migration (BFM), Quellenweg 6, 3003 Bern,

Vorinstanz.

Gegenstand

Verfügung vom 23. August 2006 i.S. Vollzug der Wegweisung / N _______.

Demnach erkennt das Bundesverwaltungsgericht:

Die Beschwerde wird gutgeheissen. Die Ziffern 4 und 5 der vorinstanzlichen Verfügung vom 23. August 2006 werden aufgehoben.

Die Sache wird im Sinne der Erwägungen zur Neubeurteilung an die Vorinstanz zurückgewiesen.

Es werden keine Verfahrenskosten auferlegt.

Das BFM hat dem Beschwerdeführer für das Verfahren vor dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht eine Parteientschädigung in der Höhe von Fr. 400.-- (inkl. Auslagen) auszurichten.

Dieses Urteil geht an:

  • den Rechtsvertreter der Beschwerdeführerin (eingeschrieben)

  • die Vorinstanz, Abteilung Aufenthalt und Rückkehrförderung, mit deren Akten (Ref.-Nr. N _______, in Kopie)

  • _______ (in Kopie)

Der Richter: Die Gerichtsschreiberin:

Hans Schürch Eva Zürcher

Versand am:

Keywords

immigrationremoval enforcementappealremandparty compensationcourt costs

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the challenged parts of the BFM decision on removal enforcement should be annulled.

Extracted holding

The appeal was granted and items 4 and 5 of the BFM decision were set aside.

Extracted reasoning

The court found that the contested enforcement measures could not stand on the present record and required renewed assessment by the authority.

Key legal question

What procedural consequences follow from the partial success of the appeal, including costs and compensation.

Extracted holding

No court costs were imposed, and the appellant was awarded party compensation of CHF 400 against the BFM.

Extracted reasoning

Because the appeal succeeded, the appellant was spared procedural costs and was entitled to reimbursement of necessary expenses.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.