Appeal against revocation of provisional admission dismissed

d-2320-2008Federal Administrative Court / Division 4May 22, 2008Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

Z., an Iraqi national, appealed to the Federal Administrative Court against the BFM's decision of 12 March 2008 revoking his provisional admission. The court, sitting as a single judge with the consent of another judge, dismissed the appeal. It also ordered court costs of CHF 600 to be borne by the appellant and offset them against the advance payment made on 25 April 2008.

Omnilex headnote

Appeal against revocation of provisional admission; dismissal of the appeal where the challenged administrative decision is left unchanged. Unsuccessful appellants bear the court costs, which may be set off against an advance on costs (consid. not indicated in the excerpt).

Full text

BVGer D-2320/2008

Entscheiddatum: 22.05.2008Publikationsdatum: 02.06.2008

Tribunal administrativ federal

Abteilung IV

D-2320/2008

{T 0/2}

Urteil vom 22. Mai 2008

Besetzung

Einzelrichter Hans Schürch, mit Zustimmung von Richter Bruno Huber,

Gerichtsschreiberin Eva Zürcher.

Parteien

Z._______, geboren _______, Irak,

_______,

Beschwerdeführer,

gegen

Bundesamt für Migration (BFM),

Quellenweg 6, 3003 Bern,

Vorinstanz.

Gegenstand

Aufhebung vorläufige Aufnahme; Verfügung des BFM vom 12. März 2008 / N _______.

Demnach erkennt das Bundesverwaltungsgericht:

Die Beschwerde wird abgewiesen.

Die Verfahrenskosten von Fr. 600.-- werden dem Beschwerdeführer auferlegt und mit dem am 25. April 2008 einbezahlten Kostenvorschuss verrechnet.

Dieses Urteil geht an:

  • den Beschwerdeführer (Einschreiben)

  • das BFM, Abteilung Aufenthalt und Rückkehrförderung, mit den Akten Ref.-Nr. N _______ (per Kurier; in Kopie)

  • _______ (in Kopie)

Der vorsitzende Richter: Die Gerichtsschreiberin:

A. Hans Schürch Eva Zürcher

Keywords

immigrationprovisional admissionrevocationappealcourt costs

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the revocation of provisional admission should be annulled.

Extracted holding

The appeal against the revocation of provisional admission was dismissed; the BFM's decision remained in force.

Extracted reasoning

The judgment contains no detailed reasoning in the excerpt; it simply rejects the challenge to the BFM decision.

Key legal question

Who bears the proceedings costs and in what amount.

Extracted holding

The appellant must pay court costs of CHF 600, offset against the advance payment made on 2008-04-25.

Extracted reasoning

As the appeal was unsuccessful, the costs were charged to the appellant and set off against the deposited advance.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.