Key legal question
Whether the appeal met the formal requirements of reasoning and submission of the challenged decision.
Extracted holding
The appeal was manifestly insufficiently reasoned and the challenged decision was not produced; the defects were not cured in time.
Extracted reasoning
The filing contained only health complaints and assertions of deterioration and reduced work capacity, which did not satisfy Art. 42 paras. 1-2 LTF; the missing decision also breached Art. 42 paras. 3 and 5 LTF.